The Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed allowing new classes of mutual funds under which broker-dealers would set their own commissions and sales charges that they would collect directly from investors. Currently, when a broker-dealer puts a client in a mutual fund, the investor will pay the broker commissions or sales charges set by the fund.
The problem with the SEC proposal is that it would leave many investors without an expert to turn to when they need guidance. Good broker-dealers provide mutual fund clients with advice, administrative assistance and additional service long after the initial sale. Under the SEC proposal, however, market competition would inevitably focus on sales commissions, not the level of service provided by brokers. In a race to the bottom, some broker-dealers would certainly charge bargain-basement commissions to rack up high sales volumes, and, human nature being what it is, middle-market investors would be drawn to them.
It’s what happens next that has us concerned. That’s because what’s likely to happen is — nothing. To offset the low commissions and sales charges, brokers will have little choice but to reduce or eliminate their post-sale advice and service to all but their wealthier clients. Meanwhile, middle-market investors — just the people the SEC says it aims to protect — will be left to fend for themselves as they are deprived of the guidance they need and deserve.
As one NAIFA member said in comments to the SEC, the proposal would encourage broker-dealers to view a mutual fund transaction merely “as a ‘sale’ rather than the beginning of a relationship.”
The SEC comment period on the proposed rule runs through November 5, and NAIFA encourages securities-licensed broker-dealers to submit their views.
More information, as well as a list of taking points, is available in a NAIFA GovAlert.
Recent Comments